Constant-Masterpiece
0x91542e60cf1c5e9ca64bf83615a36e6a85e38f2d
Wallet digest
Activity score
67/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
19
Open notional
$44.23
Total PnL
$-324.08
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 19- OVER
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5
69 shares @ 29.0¢·now 32.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$22.37
$2.41
- OVER
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 3.5
103 shares @ 31.0¢·now 11.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$11.86
$-20.11
- YES
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Both Teams to Score
25 shares @ 38.0¢·now 39.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$9.88
$0.38
- OVER
Kyōto Sanga FC vs. V-Varen Nagasaki: O/U 2.5
77 shares @ 35.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.04
$-26.99
- OVER
Kashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō: O/U 1.5
52 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.03
$-9.78
- OVER
AC Nagano Parceiro vs. Ventforet Kōfu: O/U 1.5
35 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.02
$-17.13
- YES
Will Ventforet Kōfu win on 2026-05-23?
33 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.02
$-11.53
- OVER
AC Nagano Parceiro vs. Ventforet Kōfu: O/U 2.5
33 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.02
$-8.23
- YES
Sydney FC leading at halftime?
27 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.01
$-5.93
- OVER
Auckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5
189 shares @ 28.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-53.42
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$0.28May 23, 12:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$11.89May 23, 12:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$1.45May 23, 12:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$1.45May 23, 12:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$1.45May 23, 12:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$1.45May 23, 12:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$0.54May 23, 12:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$1.45May 23, 12:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Both Teams to Score$9.50May 23, 12:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 3.5$32.63May 23, 10:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYKyōto Sanga FC vs. V-Varen Nagasaki: O/U 2.5$12.84May 23, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYKyōto Sanga FC vs. V-Varen Nagasaki: O/U 2.5$1.65May 23, 10:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYKyōto Sanga FC vs. V-Varen Nagasaki: O/U 2.5$12.54May 23, 10:25 UTC
- TRADESELLAuckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5$26.73May 23, 10:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYKashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō: O/U 1.5$5.86May 23, 10:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYKashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō: O/U 1.5$3.94May 23, 10:20 UTC
- TRADESELLAuckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5$9.90May 23, 10:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5$11.06May 23, 09:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5$10.00May 23, 09:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5$3.30May 23, 09:59 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $7.53
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 23, 07:18 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 12:19 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".