Alarming-Cesspool
0xb0f47416ad54915aea513144d7f3a9429b446fa9
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$4.8K
Total PnL
$-2.7K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- HOUSTON ASTROS
Houston Astros vs. Chicago Cubs
904 shares @ 69.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$903.88
$280.22
- TORONTO BLUE JAYS
Pittsburgh Pirates vs. Toronto Blue Jays
619 shares @ 77.3¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$619.07
$140.23
- LOS ANGELES ANGELS
Texas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels
538 shares @ 64.2¢·now 90.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$487.10
$141.70
- ATLANTA BRAVES
Washington Nationals vs. Atlanta Braves
442 shares @ 49.1¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$441.92
$224.68
- TAMPA BAY RAYS
Tampa Bay Rays vs. New York Yankees
404 shares @ 41.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$403.79
$236.13
- CLEVELAND GUARDIANS
Cleveland Guardians vs. Philadelphia Phillies
368 shares @ 39.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$367.61
$222.58
- MINNESOTA TWINS
Minnesota Twins vs. Boston Red Sox
291 shares @ 20.3¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$290.85
$231.64
- BALTIMORE ORIOLES
Detroit Tigers vs. Baltimore Orioles
212 shares @ 54.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$211.89
$95.77
- SEATTLE MARINERS
Seattle Mariners vs. Kansas City Royals
155 shares @ 89.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$154.79
$16.96
- CHICAGO WHITE SOX
Chicago White Sox vs. San Francisco Giants
150 shares @ 72.5¢·now 91.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$137.62
$28.59
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$29.45May 23, 03:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$8.60May 23, 03:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$30.57May 23, 03:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$15.83May 23, 03:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Arizona Diamondbacks$3.83May 23, 03:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYChicago White Sox vs. San Francisco Giants$84.26May 23, 03:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$0.68May 23, 02:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYAthletics vs. San Diego Padres$1.71May 23, 02:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYAthletics vs. San Diego Padres$14.63May 23, 02:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYAthletics vs. San Diego Padres$14.63May 23, 02:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYAthletics vs. San Diego Padres$5.50May 23, 02:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYChicago White Sox vs. San Francisco Giants$25.56May 23, 02:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$89.20May 23, 02:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWashington Nationals vs. Atlanta Braves$2.15May 23, 02:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWashington Nationals vs. Atlanta Braves$11.56May 23, 02:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWashington Nationals vs. Atlanta Braves$6.64May 23, 02:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWashington Nationals vs. Atlanta Braves$2.05May 23, 02:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$0.67May 23, 02:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$4.74May 23, 02:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Los Angeles Angels$0.90May 23, 02:01 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $20.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 23, 01:30 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 03:19 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".