0xb5c976561f08c1f386a55f6a635fc22182d3a4fc
0xb5c976561f08c1f386a55f6a635fc22182d3a4fc
Wallet digest
Activity score
100/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
106
Open notional
$412.52
Total PnL
$21.08
Realised
$-0.09
Win rate
67%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 106- YES
Will Argentina win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
1254 shares @ 9.1¢·now 8.5¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$105.98
$-8.15
- NO
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-24?
28 shares @ 72.0¢·now 71.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$20.06
$-0.14
- NO
Will FC Nantes win on 2026-05-17?
13 shares @ 62.5¢·now 98.6¢·exp May 17, 2026$12.60
$4.61
- NO
Will Shandong Taishan FC win on 2026-05-20?
12 shares @ 58.3¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$12.07
$5.00
- YES
Will the New York Knicks win the 2026 NBA Finals?
65 shares @ 9.3¢·now 17.9¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$11.72
$5.66
- YES
Will Zhejiang Zhiye FC win on 2026-05-20?
12 shares @ 33.0¢·now 95.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$11.42
$7.48
- NO
Will Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-23?
17 shares @ 58.4¢·now 59.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$10.29
$0.19
- NO
Will SC Freiburg win on 2026-05-20?
11 shares @ 82.8¢·now 83.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$9.17
$0.08
- SHANGHAI SHARKS
Beijing Ducks vs. Shanghai Sharks
9 shares @ 66.6¢·now 99.9¢·exp May 27, 2026$9.09
$3.03
- UNDER
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: O/U 1.5
9 shares @ 22.4¢·now 87.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$7.89
$5.87
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-23?$1.03May 20, 13:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bologna FC 1909 win on 2026-05-24?$1.03May 20, 13:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-23?$1.03May 20, 13:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC end in a draw?$1.04May 20, 13:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bologna FC 1909 win on 2026-05-24?$1.03May 20, 13:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-24?$1.03May 20, 13:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Getafe CF win on 2026-05-23?$1.03May 20, 12:39 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Zhejiang Zhiye FC win on 2026-05-20?$0.10May 20, 12:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanghai Sharks$1.03May 20, 11:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.03May 20, 11:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanghai Sharks$1.03May 20, 11:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanghai Sharks$1.03May 20, 11:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.03May 20, 11:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanghai Sharks$1.03May 20, 11:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC end in a draw?$1.03May 20, 11:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Damac Saudi Club win on 2026-05-21?$1.02May 20, 11:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC end in a draw?$1.03May 20, 11:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: Both Teams to Score$1.03May 20, 11:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanghai Sharks$1.03May 20, 11:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Shanghai Sharks$1.03May 20, 11:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $1.01
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 20, 10:07 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 13:33 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".