Finished-Rib
0xc56d63a3f5d818b4e0fa8cb94fe80f06e094c484
Wallet digest
Activity score
68/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
15
Open notional
$2.0K
Total PnL
$-2.0K
Realised
$-154.68
Win rate
33%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- UNDER
Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 4.5
3080 shares @ 84.5¢·now 66.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$2.0K
$-554.99
- UNDER
Real Racing Club vs. Real Valladolid CF: O/U 3.5
400 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-292.00
- YES
Will Chelsea FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?
400 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-104.00
- UNDER
Newcastle United FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 3.5
300 shares @ 70.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-210.00
- OVER
Arsenal FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 3.5
297 shares @ 35.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-104.82
- UNDER
Burnley FC vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5
238 shares @ 47.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-113.50
- YES
Will Arsenal FC vs. Club Atlético de Madrid end in a draw?
229 shares @ 17.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 5, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- UNDER
Burnley FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 1.5
198 shares @ 68.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-136.25
- OVER
Arsenal FC vs. Sporting CP: O/U 1.5
195 shares @ 10.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-20.44
- YES
Will Manchester United FC vs. Liverpool FC end in a draw?
171 shares @ 13.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-22.61
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 4.5$131.91May 23, 16:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 4.5$5.25May 23, 16:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 4.5$5.66May 23, 16:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 4.5$512.29May 23, 16:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 4.5$853.83May 23, 16:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 4.5$1.1KMay 23, 16:02 UTC
- TRADESELLHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$0.91May 23, 16:00 UTC
- TRADESELLHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$1.3KMay 23, 15:58 UTC
- TRADESELLHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$14.82May 23, 15:58 UTC
- TRADESELLHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$1.3KMay 23, 15:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$166.85May 23, 14:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$750.81May 23, 14:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$4.26May 23, 14:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$4.86May 23, 14:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$16.72May 23, 14:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$402.40May 23, 14:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 3.5$794.98May 23, 14:06 UTC
- REDEEMAvispa Fukuoka vs. Vissel Kōbe: O/U 3.5$1.1KMay 23, 10:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYAvispa Fukuoka vs. Vissel Kōbe: O/U 3.5$1.0KMay 23, 06:27 UTC
- REDEEMMexico vs. Ghana: O/U 3.5$736.93May 23, 06:17 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $388.08
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 22, 20:13 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 16:24 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".