Dapper-Purpose
0xde7b5978230ed73fc98f806a10b792f473e8f8e4
Wallet digest
Activity score
90/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
18
Open notional
$988.33
Total PnL
$-1.75
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 18- NO
Will the highest temperature in Shanghai be 21°C or below on May 24?
113 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.9¢·exp May 24, 2026$113.21
$-0.06
- NO
Will the highest temperature in Shanghai be 22°C on May 24?
100 shares @ 97.6¢·now 98.4¢·exp May 24, 2026$98.35
$0.75
- OVER
Total Kills Over/Under 23.5 in Game 3?
60 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$59.70
$-0.24
- UNDER
Total Kills Over/Under 35.5 in Game 2?
60 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$59.70
$-0.24
- UNDER
Total Kills Over/Under 34.5 in Game 3?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$49.98
$0.02
- UNDER
Total Kills Over/Under 29.5 in Game 3?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$49.98
$0.02
- UNDER
Total Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$49.98
$0.02
- OVER
Total Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 3?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$49.75
$-0.20
- UNDER
Total Kills Over/Under 28.5 in Game 3?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$49.75
$-0.20
- UNDER
Total Kills Over/Under 32.5 in Game 3?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$49.75
$-0.20
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 38.5 in Game 2?$9.99May 23, 15:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Shanghai be 22°C on May 24?$97.72May 23, 14:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the highest temperature in Shanghai be 21°C or below on May 24?$113.27May 23, 14:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 34.5 in Game 2?$49.95May 23, 13:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 35.5 in Game 2?$59.94May 23, 13:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 37.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 36.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 34.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 33.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 32.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 31.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 29.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 28.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 25.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 24.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 23.5 in Game 3?$59.94May 23, 13:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 22.5 in Game 3?$49.95May 23, 13:42 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum dip to $2,000 on May 22?$670.00May 23, 05:22 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $2,150 on May 22?$438.12May 23, 05:18 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $96.25
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 15, 00:45 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 15:18 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".