Masculine-Acceptance
0xe31a7ca000f18fce93b3da39dde63bace5e9da31
Wallet digest
Activity score
67/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
98
Open notional
$44.51
Total PnL
$-114.08
Realised
$-0.06
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 98- YES
Will PSG win the 2025–26 Champions League?
53 shares @ 57.3¢·now 58.5¢·exp May 31, 2026$30.91
$0.63
- YES
Will the San Antonio Spurs win the 2026 NBA Finals?
9 shares @ 22.3¢·now 37.9¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$3.39
$1.39
- TOMMY PAUL
Hamburg European Open: Tommy Paul vs Tomas Etcheverry
3 shares @ 58.0¢·now 56.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$1.95
$-0.05
- GONZALO BUENO
Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Gonzalo Bueno vs Vitaliy Sachko
2 shares @ 52.0¢·now 82.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$1.90
$0.70
- FRANCISCO COMESANA
Geneva Open: Francisco Comesana vs Jaume Munar
2 shares @ 41.0¢·now 41.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$1.01
$0.01
- YES
Will Croatia win Group L in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
5 shares @ 22.0¢·now 21.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$0.98
$-0.02
- YES
Will Türkiye win Group D in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
3 shares @ 38.0¢·now 35.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$0.93
$-0.07
- YES
Will Czechia win Group A in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
4 shares @ 24.0¢·now 21.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$0.90
$-0.10
- YES
Will Morocco win Group C in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
5 shares @ 21.0¢·now 18.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$0.88
$-0.12
- OVER
Comesana vs. Munar: Match O/U 21.5
3 shares @ 57.0¢·now 31.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$0.83
$-0.67
Recent activity
- TRADESELLGeneva Open: Cameron Norrie vs Mariano Navone$2.27May 20, 11:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYGeneva Open: Francisco Comesana vs Jaume Munar$1.02May 20, 08:58 UTC
- TRADESELLComesana vs. Munar: Match O/U 22.5$0.94May 20, 08:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYComesana vs. Munar: Match O/U 21.5$1.52May 20, 08:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYComesana vs. Munar: Match O/U 22.5$1.02May 20, 08:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Gonzalo Bueno vs Vitaliy Sachko$1.22May 20, 08:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYGeneva Open: Cameron Norrie vs Mariano Navone$1.27May 20, 08:51 UTC
- REDEEMTexas Rangers vs. Colorado Rockies$3.16May 20, 05:13 UTC
- REDEEMCavaliers vs. Knicks$2.94May 20, 03:29 UTC
- REDEEMBaltimore Orioles vs. Tampa Bay Rays$2.35May 20, 02:41 UTC
- REDEEMCleveland Guardians vs. Detroit Tigers$3.33May 20, 02:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Colorado Rockies$1.63May 19, 21:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYBaltimore Orioles vs. Tampa Bay Rays$1.22May 19, 21:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYCleveland Guardians vs. Detroit Tigers$2.02May 19, 21:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Knicks$2.02May 19, 21:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYHamburg European Open: Tommy Paul vs Tomas Etcheverry$2.03May 19, 21:14 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Arsenal win the 2025–26 Champions League?$0.97May 18, 18:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Leganés win on 2026-05-18?$1.02May 18, 18:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Leganés win on 2026-05-18?$1.02May 18, 18:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal win the 2025–26 Champions League?$1.01May 18, 11:07 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $1.58
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 13, 20:54 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 11:02 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".