Flaky-Lightning-Element
0xe75eb6ed237acd525d6d74e65a0b78b665ab4b67
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
169
Open notional
$1.2K
Total PnL
$-40.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 169- NO
Will Shandong Taishan FC win on 2026-05-20?
300 shares @ 58.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$299.85
$125.85
- OVER
SE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5
600 shares @ 50.0¢·now 47.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$282.00
$-18.00
- NO
Will Aston Villa FC win on 2026-05-20?
600 shares @ 42.0¢·now 40.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$243.00
$-9.00
- NO
Will Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?
158 shares @ 67.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$157.47
$51.91
- NO
Will Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC end in a draw?
151 shares @ 74.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$151.28
$39.28
- UNDER
Al Khaleej Saudi Club vs. Al Ahli Saudi Club: O/U 3.5
105 shares @ 57.0¢·now 59.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$61.95
$2.10
- UNDER
SE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5
1 shares @ 51.0¢·now 53.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.59
$0.02
- UNDER
Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 3.5
300 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.15
$-167.85
- UNDER
Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 2.5
300 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.15
$-104.85
- NO
Will Liaoning Tieren FC win on 2026-05-20?
300 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.15
$-164.85
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5$0.57May 20, 15:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYSE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5$300.00May 20, 14:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Khaleej Saudi Club vs. Al Ahli Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$60.62May 20, 12:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 2.5$105.00May 20, 11:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 3.5$168.00May 20, 11:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?$60.91May 20, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?$17.40May 20, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?$19.09May 20, 10:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?$4.60May 20, 10:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?$3.56May 20, 10:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC end in a draw?$112.88May 20, 08:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Aston Villa FC win on 2026-05-20?$256.38May 20, 06:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Shandong Taishan FC win on 2026-05-20?$176.19May 20, 04:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liaoning Tieren FC win on 2026-05-20?$167.23May 20, 02:20 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$4.38May 20, 00:45 UTC
- REWARD$2.14May 20, 00:00 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?$2.4KMay 19, 22:46 UTC
- REDEEMChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 2.5$1.2KMay 19, 22:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Independiente del Valle (-1.5)$300.00May 19, 18:40 UTC
- REDEEMQingdao Xihaian FC vs. Beijing Guoan FC: O/U 4.5$28.13May 19, 17:38 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 29
- Avg trade size
- $199.57
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 01:44 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 15:14 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".