Superficial-Latitude
0xed9d872779eba1234ff0160f44142da8e2d2444a
Wallet digest
Activity score
86/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
7
Open notional
$152.55
Total PnL
$-1.14
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC end in a draw?
86 shares @ 71.0¢·now 70.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$60.63
$-0.43
- YES
Will Audax CS Italiano vs. CA Barracas Central end in a draw?
84 shares @ 29.4¢·now 29.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$24.75
$0.09
- YES
Will Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?
101 shares @ 24.0¢·now 24.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$24.75
$0.51
- YES
Will Kashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō end in a draw?
86 shares @ 29.0¢·now 28.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$23.94
$-0.85
- YES
Will Cusco FC vs. Independiente Medellín end in a draw?
33 shares @ 31.0¢·now 30.5¢·exp May 21, 2026$10.06
$-0.17
- YES
Will Mirassol FC vs. Fluminense FC end in a draw?
18 shares @ 31.0¢·now 30.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$5.27
$-0.18
- YES
Will Club Olimpia vs. CR Vasco da Gama end in a draw?
11 shares @ 30.0¢·now 29.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$3.14
$-0.11
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Kashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō end in a draw?$10.37May 18, 14:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Kashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō end in a draw?$4.59May 18, 14:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Kashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō end in a draw?$10.37May 18, 14:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Cusco FC vs. Independiente Medellín end in a draw?$10.44May 18, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Mirassol FC vs. Fluminense FC end in a draw?$5.56May 18, 13:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC end in a draw?$20.77May 18, 12:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Club Olimpia vs. CR Vasco da Gama end in a draw?$3.32May 18, 12:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC end in a draw?$20.05May 18, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC end in a draw?$20.77May 18, 12:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Audax CS Italiano vs. CA Barracas Central end in a draw?$10.23May 18, 12:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Audax CS Italiano vs. CA Barracas Central end in a draw?$4.59May 18, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Audax CS Italiano vs. CA Barracas Central end in a draw?$10.37May 18, 12:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?$24.80May 18, 07:54 UTC
- REDEEMWill Urawa Red Diamonds vs. FC Tōkyō end in a draw?$0.50May 18, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMWill CF Montréal vs. Chicago Fire FC end in a draw?$0.00May 18, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Eintracht Frankfurt 2 - 2 VfB Stuttgart?$0.00May 18, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMWill Wuhan San Zhen FC vs. Liaoning Tieren FC end in a draw?$0.00May 18, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Olympique de Marseille 2 - 2 Stade Rennais FC 1901?$22.00May 18, 02:13 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Olympique Lyonnais 2 - 2 Racing Club de Lens?$23.00May 18, 02:11 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Sevilla FC 2 - 2 Real Madrid CF?$22.00May 17, 23:23 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 29
- Avg trade size
- $14.65
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 16, 02:51 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 14:31 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".