Trusting-Profile
0xefe5d4ce26f00fb4b2154cf6139979509d506f6b
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
24
Open notional
$1.3K
Total PnL
$-29.4K
Realised
$-6.46
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 24- YES
Will Predict.fun launch a token by December 31, 2026?
1100 shares @ 75.0¢·now 61.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$671.00
$-154.00
- NO
Will the Iranian regime fall by June 30?
340 shares @ 59.0¢·now 95.5¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$324.70
$124.10
- YES
Predict.fun FDV above $300M one day after launch?
400 shares @ 46.0¢·now 69.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$277.96
$93.96
- YES
Will Reza Pahlavi enter Iran by June 30?
900 shares @ 22.0¢·now 2.5¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$22.86
$-175.14
- SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS
San Francisco Giants vs. Los Angeles Dodgers
30000 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.00
$-11.7K
- JD GAMING
LoL: Weibo Gaming vs JD Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend
11440 shares @ 67.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$0.00
$-7.8K
- GEN.G
LoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2
10000 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-6.4K
- YES
Netanyahu out by March 31?
6796 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-237.85
- YES
Will Xiaomi have the best AI model at the end of April 2026?
3414 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-34.37
- YES
Will the next model released by DeepSeek debut at a score of at least 1460?
2075 shares @ 6.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$0.00
$-142.51
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$17.07May 17, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$48.55May 16, 07:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$160.00May 16, 07:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$4.92May 16, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$184.89May 16, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$142.49May 16, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$53.33May 16, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$12.80May 16, 07:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$3.43May 16, 07:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$65.78May 16, 07:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$2.6KMay 16, 07:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$54.44May 16, 07:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$56.34May 16, 07:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$8.89May 16, 07:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$6.89May 16, 07:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$1.4KMay 16, 07:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$14.22May 16, 06:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$53.33May 16, 06:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$17.78May 16, 06:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$888.89May 16, 06:54 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 47
- Avg trade size
- $1.5K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 14, 11:29 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".