Gleeful-Appetite
0xf12dd9d3fa874478517c7e6a81a1170e939c0fdd
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
33
Open notional
$0.07
Total PnL
$-1.4K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 33- YES
FC Internazionale Milano leading at halftime?
150 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 24, 2026$0.07
$-29.93
- YES
Will Chengdu Rongcheng FC win on 2026-05-23?
678 shares @ 7.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Will SC Heerenveen win on 2026-05-21?
400 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Burnley FC win on 2026-05-18?
380 shares @ 3.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Juventus FC vs. ACF Fiorentina end in a draw?
323 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Ventforet Kōfu win on 2026-05-23?
303 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
SC Heerenveen leading at halftime?
273 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- YES
Will FBC Melgar win on 2026-05-22?
245 shares @ 40.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Ventforet Kōfu leading at halftime?
227 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-25.00
- OVER
SC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 3.5
213 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLBologna FC 1909 leading at halftime?$153.66May 23, 16:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Internazionale Milano leading at halftime?$30.72May 23, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 leading at halftime?$30.74May 23, 16:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Dalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC end in a draw?$15.40May 23, 13:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chengdu Rongcheng FC win on 2026-05-23?$51.39May 23, 13:37 UTC
- TRADESELLDalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 1.5$1.3KMay 23, 13:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYDalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 1.5$911.07May 23, 12:59 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC win on 2026-05-23?$1.95May 23, 12:28 UTC
- TRADESELLShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 1.5$155.81May 23, 12:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYKyōto Sanga FC vs. V-Varen Nagasaki: O/U 1.5$30.69May 23, 11:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC win on 2026-05-23?$30.73May 23, 11:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 1.5$202.82May 23, 11:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYVentforet Kōfu leading at halftime?$25.67May 23, 07:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ventforet Kōfu win on 2026-05-23?$102.01May 23, 07:33 UTC
- TRADESELLVegalta Sendai vs. Yokohama FC: O/U 2.5$42.11May 23, 06:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Gifu vs. RB Ōmiya Ardija: O/U 2.5$15.27May 23, 06:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYVegalta Sendai vs. Yokohama FC: O/U 2.5$20.32May 23, 06:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYVegalta Sendai vs. Yokohama FC: Both Teams to Score$25.51May 23, 06:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Iwaki FC win on 2026-05-23?$20.42May 23, 06:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYADC Juan Pablo II College vs. FBC Melgar: O/U 2.5$50.69May 22, 21:28 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $172.55
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 20:06 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 16:49 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".