Common-Astrologer
0xf1e0fb17c53ee8e4551aacfa9ba12df248c0041b
Wallet digest
Activity score
93/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
12
Open notional
$1.5K
Total PnL
$81.41
Realised
$-6.12
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 12- AL NAJMAH SAUDI CLUB
Spread: Al Shabab Saudi Club (-1.5)
312 shares @ 61.0¢·now 62.5¢·exp May 21, 2026$195.00
$4.68
- UNDER
Al Khaleej Saudi Club vs. Al Ahli Saudi Club: O/U 3.5
311 shares @ 59.0¢·now 59.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$183.71
$0.00
- NO
Will Qingdao Hainiu FC win on 2026-05-20?
156 shares @ 70.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$155.92
$46.72
- NO
Will Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?
156 shares @ 68.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$155.92
$49.84
- NO
Will Yunnan Yukun FC win on 2026-05-20?
156 shares @ 61.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$155.92
$60.76
- NO
Will Shandong Taishan FC win on 2026-05-20?
156 shares @ 58.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$155.92
$65.44
- NO
Will Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC end in a draw?
156 shares @ 74.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$155.92
$40.48
- OVER
SE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5
312 shares @ 50.0¢·now 47.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$146.64
$-9.36
- NO
Will Aston Villa FC win on 2026-05-20?
312 shares @ 41.0¢·now 40.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$126.36
$-1.56
- YES
Will CR Flamengo win on 2026-05-07?
78 shares @ 73.0¢·now 77.5¢·exp May 8, 2026$60.74
$3.53
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5$28.29May 20, 14:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYSE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5$3.50May 20, 14:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYSE Palmeiras vs. Club Cerro Porteño: O/U 2.5$124.22May 20, 14:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Al Shabab Saudi Club (-1.5)$192.55May 20, 13:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 3.5$87.36May 20, 11:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC win on 2026-05-20?$107.10May 20, 10:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Yunnan Yukun FC win on 2026-05-20?$96.27May 20, 09:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill Qingdao Xihaian FC vs. Beijing Guoan FC end in a draw?$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- REDEEMWill Henan FC win on 2026-05-19?$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- REDEEMQingdao Xihaian FC vs. Beijing Guoan FC: O/U 2.5$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Arsenal FC (-2.5)$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Independiente del Valle (-1.5)$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Chelsea FC (-1.5)$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- REDEEMWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-05-19?$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- REDEEMArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 3.5$0.00May 20, 09:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Zhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC end in a draw?$116.34May 20, 08:30 UTC
- REDEEMWill Independiente del Valle vs. Club Libertad end in a draw?$31.00May 20, 07:57 UTC
- REDEEMCA Boca Juniors vs. Cruzeiro EC: O/U 1.5$5.00May 20, 06:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Shandong Taishan FC win on 2026-05-20?$91.62May 20, 04:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liaoning Tieren FC win on 2026-05-20?$86.96May 20, 02:20 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 31
- Avg trade size
- $107.16
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 20:51 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 14:28 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".