0xf8748c135e7aacfab1472c89cc41511a878edef4
0xf8748c135e7aacfab1472c89cc41511a878edef4
Wallet digest
Activity score
79/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
16
Open notional
$437.38
Total PnL
$-83.75
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 16- KNICKS
Cavaliers vs. Knicks
143 shares @ 70.0¢·now 68.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$97.86
$-2.14
- NO
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?
146 shares @ 40.0¢·now 41.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$60.67
$2.19
- JACOPO VASAMI
Cervia: Moise Kouame vs Jacopo Vasami
49 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 25, 2026$48.99
$24.00
- MARTINEZ
Set Handicap: Sakamoto (-1.5) vs Martinez (+1.5)
35 shares @ 72.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 26, 2026$34.70
$9.70
- UNDER
Pavlovic vs. Wendelken: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5
32 shares @ 78.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 26, 2026$32.04
$7.04
- TOTTENHAM HOTSPUR FC
Spread: Chelsea FC (-1.5)
34 shares @ 74.0¢·now 78.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$26.52
$1.52
- YES
Will Fluminense FC win on 2026-05-19?
32 shares @ 79.0¢·now 82.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$26.11
$1.11
- NO
Will Toulouse FC win on 2026-05-17?
167 shares @ 60.0¢·now 15.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$25.83
$-74.17
- THUNDER
Spurs vs. Thunder
38 shares @ 66.0¢·now 67.5¢·exp May 21, 2026$25.57
$0.57
- YES
Will LDU de Quito win on 2026-05-20?
49 shares @ 51.0¢·now 50.5¢·exp May 21, 2026$24.75
$-0.24
Recent activity
- REDEEMCervia: Federico Arnaboldi vs Carlo Alberto Caniato$0.00May 19, 18:39 UTC
- REDEEMIvanov vs. Roncadelli: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5$24.51May 19, 17:38 UTC
- REDEEMSet 1 Winner: Ivanov vs Roncadelli$24.51May 19, 17:38 UTC
- REDEEMIvan Ivanov vs. Franco Roncadelli: Total Sets O/U 2.5$24.51May 19, 17:38 UTC
- REDEEMIvanov vs. Roncadelli: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5$24.51May 19, 17:37 UTC
- REDEEMWill Henan FC win on 2026-05-19?$0.00May 19, 17:22 UTC
- REDEEMKeegan Smith vs. Manish Sureshkumar: Total Sets O/U 2.5$0.00May 19, 17:16 UTC
- REDEEMHamburg European Open: Luciano Darderi vs Roman Andres Burruchaga$0.00May 19, 16:25 UTC
- REDEEMBengaluru 3: Naoya Honda vs Philip Sekulic$2.99May 19, 15:59 UTC
- TRADESELLShanghai Haigang FC leading at halftime?$29.03May 19, 15:54 UTC
- TRADESELLSet 1 Winner: Brooksby vs Ruud$29.38May 19, 15:54 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Li (-1.5) vs Alexandrova (+1.5)$35.67May 19, 15:54 UTC
- TRADESELLSet Handicap: Cengiz (-1.5) vs Kabbaj (+1.5)$40.94May 19, 15:54 UTC
- TRADESELLShenzhen Xinpengcheng FC vs. Dalian Yingbo FC: O/U 2.5$49.95May 19, 15:54 UTC
- REDEEMSet 1 Winner: Smith vs Sureshkumar$0.00May 19, 15:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?$59.53May 19, 15:25 UTC
- REDEEMBengaluru 3: Kuan-Yi Lee vs Kriish Tyagi$59.52May 19, 15:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYStefanini vs. Charaeva: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5$5.69May 19, 14:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYPavlovic vs. Wendelken: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5$25.16May 19, 14:05 UTC
- REDEEMCervia: Lorenzo Rottoli vs Gabriele Piraino$30.86May 19, 14:04 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $26.98
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 19, 05:09 UTC
- Last active
- May 19, 18:39 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".