Superb-Crop
0x03ba465926d6f4e451ce1db92dd0150b97f577d6
Wallet digest
Activity score
86/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
17
Open notional
$2.2K
Total PnL
$-129.42
Realised
$1.56
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 17- NO
Metamask FDV above $2B one day after launch?
688 shares @ 33.9¢·now 90.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$623.03
$389.46
- YES
Unit FDV above $200M one day after launch?
660 shares @ 61.2¢·now 62.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$409.19
$5.00
- YES
Unit FDV above $400M one day after launch?
493 shares @ 52.1¢·now 53.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$261.23
$4.55
- YES
Theo FDV above $100M one day after launch?
244 shares @ 46.4¢·now 62.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$152.50
$39.30
- YES
Consensys IPO closing market cap above $1B?
270 shares @ 56.4¢·now 39.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$105.30
$-46.90
- YES
Will Consensys IPO by December 31 2026?
385 shares @ 45.8¢·now 26.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$100.10
$-76.30
- YES
Ostium FDV above $300M one day after launch?
308 shares @ 35.5¢·now 31.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$97.00
$-12.44
- YES
Unit FDV above $600M one day after launch?
190 shares @ 39.5¢·now 46.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$88.30
$13.21
- YES
Felix Protocol FDV above $50M one day after launch?
203 shares @ 29.3¢·now 41.1¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$83.63
$23.95
- YES
Consensys IPO closing market cap above $2B?
513 shares @ 50.0¢·now 15.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$79.56
$-177.39
Recent activity
- REDEEMWingbits FDV above $50M one day after launch?$9.88Apr 24, 08:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWingbits FDV above $50M one day after launch?$8.40Apr 23, 09:10 UTC
- REDEEMEdgeX FDV above $1B one day after launch?$0.00Apr 2, 02:16 UTC
- REDEEMBased FDV above $800M one day after launch?$50.00Apr 1, 03:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYTheo FDV above $100M one day after launch?$40.00Mar 30, 10:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYTheo FDV above $100M one day after launch?$20.50Mar 30, 10:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYFelix Protocol FDV above $50M one day after launch?$5.73Mar 30, 03:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Consensys IPO by December 31 2026?$2.20Mar 30, 03:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYTheo FDV above $100M one day after launch?$27.50Mar 29, 15:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYTheo FDV above $100M one day after launch?$23.20Mar 29, 15:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYConsensys IPO closing market cap above $1B?$25.00Mar 27, 23:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYConsensys IPO closing market cap above $1B?$0.95Mar 26, 14:41 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Theo launch a token by June 30 2026?$144.89Mar 26, 08:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYConsensys IPO closing market cap above $1B?$23.40Mar 25, 14:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYFelix Protocol FDV above $50M one day after launch?$6.60Mar 25, 13:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYFelix Protocol FDV above $50M one day after launch?$9.33Mar 25, 13:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYUnit FDV above $200M one day after launch?$45.00Mar 24, 21:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYUnit FDV above $200M one day after launch?$27.50Mar 24, 21:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYConsensys IPO closing market cap above $1B?$1.64Mar 24, 06:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYConsensys IPO closing market cap above $1B?$11.20Mar 24, 06:18 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $17.92
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 7, 11:17 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 24, 08:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".