Lazy-Jeweller
0x44c9f23cacbcc097b5a57f30dca3c48df920ca41
Wallet digest
Activity score
72/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
21
Open notional
$166.65
Total PnL
$-23.48
Realised
$-5.13
Win rate
33%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 21- TAMPA BAY RAYS
Tampa Bay Rays vs. Boston Red Sox
35 shares @ 57.0¢·now 56.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$19.65
$-0.35
- YES
Will Brazil win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
111 shares @ 9.0¢·now 9.0¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$10.06
$0.06
- OVER
Crystal Palace FC vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5
22 shares @ 45.0¢·now 45.0¢·exp May 27, 2026$10.00
$0.00
- YES
Will France win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
57 shares @ 17.6¢·now 17.5¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$9.97
$-0.03
- YES
Will Spain win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
57 shares @ 17.4¢·now 17.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$9.97
$-0.03
- YES
Will England win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
89 shares @ 11.3¢·now 11.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$9.96
$-0.04
- YES
Will Portugal win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
104 shares @ 9.6¢·now 9.6¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$9.95
$-0.05
- YES
Will Argentina win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
120 shares @ 8.3¢·now 8.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$9.94
$-0.06
- YES
Crystal Palace FC vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: Both Teams to Score
20 shares @ 51.0¢·now 50.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$9.90
$-0.10
- YES
Will Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-05-27?
43 shares @ 23.0¢·now 22.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$9.78
$-0.22
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYTampa Bay Rays vs. Boston Red Sox$20.26May 25, 10:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sweden win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$10.30May 25, 10:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Crystal Palace FC 1 - 2 Rayo Vallecano de Madrid?$10.27May 25, 10:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYCrystal Palace FC vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$10.16May 25, 10:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYCrystal Palace FC vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: Both Teams to Score$10.15May 25, 10:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-05-27?$10.23May 25, 10:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Portugal win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$10.27May 25, 08:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Argentina win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$10.28May 25, 08:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill England win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$10.27May 25, 08:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Spain win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$10.25May 25, 08:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill France win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$10.25May 25, 08:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brazil win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$10.27May 25, 08:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill South Africa win on 2026-06-11?$5.13May 25, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill US Cremonese win on 2026-05-24?$0.00May 25, 08:43 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Championships: Slovakia vs. Canada$0.00May 25, 08:43 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Championships: Finland vs. Austria$0.00May 25, 08:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWorld Championships: Czechia vs. Canada$5.11May 24, 21:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWorld Championships: Sweden vs. Slovakia$5.11May 24, 21:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWorld Championships: USA vs. Austria$5.13May 24, 21:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWorld Championships: Hungary vs. Latvia$5.12May 24, 21:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $20.24
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 24, 14:07 UTC
- Last active
- May 25, 10:44 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".