Short-Term-Fund
0x4fb89d975e4e43d584b61f3c3b01802f700577d7
Wallet digest
Activity score
77/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
164
Open notional
$3.3K
Total PnL
$-575.65
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 164- NO
Variational FDV above $4B one day after launch?
476 shares @ 94.8¢·now 99.1¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$471.72
$20.55
- NO
Solstice FDV above $400M one day after launch?
175 shares @ 97.6¢·now 94.8¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$166.05
$-4.97
- NO
StandX FDV above $7B one day after launch?
155 shares @ 97.0¢·now 96.8¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$149.57
$-0.31
- NO
Felix Protocol FDV above $800M one day after launch?
150 shares @ 96.7¢·now 96.8¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$145.20
$0.09
- NO
Hyperbeat FDV above $400M one day after launch?
128 shares @ 99.0¢·now 99.2¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$126.73
$0.19
- NO
Puffpaw FDV above $400M one day after launch?
117 shares @ 96.6¢·now 94.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$110.60
$-2.50
- NO
Felix Protocol FDV above $50M one day after launch?
186 shares @ 4.2¢·now 59.4¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$110.42
$102.70
- NO
Hurupay FDV above $40M one day after launch?
117 shares @ 93.3¢·now 89.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$104.84
$-4.36
- NO
Ventuals FDV above $1.5B one day after launch?
144 shares @ 95.6¢·now 72.3¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$103.77
$-33.42
- NO
Felix Protocol FDV above $1B one day after launch?
109 shares @ 98.7¢·now 95.4¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$103.64
$-3.59
Recent activity
- REDEEMSpace FDV above $60M one day after launch?$71.52May 17, 11:05 UTC
- REDEEMSpace FDV above $200M one day after launch?$131.66May 17, 11:05 UTC
- REDEEMSpace FDV above $100M one day after launch?$227.35May 17, 11:05 UTC
- REDEEMGensyn FDV above $2B one day after launch?$1.0KMay 17, 11:05 UTC
- REDEEMUSD.AI FDV above $800M one day after launch?$480.49Apr 25, 06:48 UTC
- REDEEMUSD.AI FDV above $3B one day after launch?$1.7KApr 25, 06:48 UTC
- REDEEMUSD.AI FDV above $1B one day after launch?$2.4KApr 25, 06:48 UTC
- REDEEMUSD.AI FDV above $2B one day after launch?$2.4KApr 25, 06:48 UTC
- REDEEMBased FDV above $2B one day after launch?$59.99Apr 5, 09:12 UTC
- REDEEMMezo FDV above $1B one day after launch?$154.46Apr 5, 09:12 UTC
- REDEEMBased FDV above $1B one day after launch?$394.49Apr 5, 09:12 UTC
- REDEEMBased FDV above $3B one day after launch?$492.01Apr 5, 09:12 UTC
- REDEEMBased FDV above $4B one day after launch?$849.89Apr 5, 09:12 UTC
- REDEEMBackpack FDV above $4B one day after launch?$2.7KApr 5, 09:12 UTC
- REDEEMWill Palantir (PLTR) close above $158 end of February?$8.47Mar 21, 08:42 UTC
- REDEEMWill Juventus FC vs. Pisa SC end in a draw?$10.00Mar 21, 08:42 UTC
- REDEEMFabric FDV above $500M one day after launch?$15.11Mar 21, 08:42 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 24, 1:35PM-1:40PM ET$15.44Mar 21, 08:42 UTC
- REDEEMFabric FDV above $600M one day after launch?$18.23Mar 21, 08:42 UTC
- REDEEMWill AC Milan win on 2026-03-08?$20.00Mar 21, 08:42 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 15
- Avg trade size
- $3.60
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 24, 18:15 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 11:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".